Debunking Skin Cancer Myths

There was once a time, when hearing that someone is suffering from cancer was a rare thing, because cancer was not a prominent disease. However, today, most people know someone who is suffering from cancer in some part of their body. Skin cancer has become one of the most prevalent types of cancer.

What is interesting is that while there are several things that people do not know about skin cancer, there are just as many myths associated with it as well. Here are some of the most common myths, related to skin cancer:

• People with dark skin are not at risk for sun damage or skin cancer:

It is considered that people with lighter skin are more prone to skin cancer, while people with darker skin are safe. Although people with darker skin are comparatively safer, in no way is their skin completely safe from skin cancer or damage caused due to the sun’s rays. People with darker skin too need to take care of their skin, especially when they are stepping out in the sun, and they too need to invest in good quality sunscreen. As a matter of fact, darker people face greater danger, because detecting skin cancer in them is much tougher and in many cases, the diagnosis comes a little too late.

• Simply because there are not too much outdoor activities in one’s routine, they have less risk for skin cancer:

You might not be someone who spends hours outdoors, but you would obviously step out for a few minutes each day. This could be to send your child to school or purchase groceries; it could even be the time you take to walk from the car park into the mall. Adding up all these tiny amounts of times of sun exposure would be enough to lead to skin damage. As a matter of fact, studies have shown that brief amounts of time spent outdoors, between 10 am and 4 pm, are more than enough to cause squamous cell cancer. Although squamous cell cancer might not be as severe or serious as melanoma, it can become extremely difficult to treat, if not caught in time.

• Those who are out in the snow, skiing or snowboarding need not wear sunscreen, because during the winter months, the sun is not strong enough:

The winter months are the most dangerous, because during the summers, people knowingly take all the required protection, such as hats, clothing and sunscreen. However, during the winter months, the sun provides a sense of warmth that most people enjoy, but little do they realise that the sun is still powerful enough to cause damage. In addition, when you are out on the white snow, the rays of the sun tend to get reflected, leading to greater chances of skin cancer. This is why sunscreen is just as important in the winter months.

• If the day is cloudy, you can skip the sunscreen:

Simply because the sun is not visible does not mean that it is not there or that it cannot cause any damage. Even when the sun is hidden behind the clouds, the ultraviolet rays are able to penetrate and they can cause much damage to your skin. While you might not feel the heat of the sun as much, there is still the chance of you getting a sunburn. This is why, even on a cloudy day, you need to make sure that you wear plenty of sunscreen and have protective clothing when stepping out.

• All sunscreens are the same:

While most people think that sunscreens that have a sun protection factor or SPF of 30 is the best, there are actually several levels to this protective lotion too. Understanding the same is the first step towards being sun safe. For starters, if you do not apply ample amount of sunscreen or apply it incorrectly, then even the most powerful sunscreen might not be enough. If you are someone who does not like to slather on sunscreen, then it would make sense to invest in a higher grade. People who spend greater amount of time in the sun and tend to sweat a lot will have to apply more sunscreen.

• It is only UVB radiation that can lead to skin damage and cancer:

Both UVA and UVB are dangerous and can lead to damaged skin, which is why you need to look for a sunscreen that provides protection against both.

• Tanning will reduce the chance of getting skin cancer:

Simply because you are someone who gets tanned and not sunburnt, does not mean that you will not get skin cancer. The very fact that you are getting tanned means that your skin has been altered. When the colour of your skin changes, it is an indication of damage and studies have shown that more the tanning on your skin, the greater the chances of you getting cancer! When your skin has been exposed to too much sun, there is an increase in the amount of melanin and this could lead to melanoma. Some of the other problems would include wrinkles, fine lines and pigmentation.

• Cut off a mole that looks suspicious and you will be safe from cancer:

A mole might look bad and cutting it off could provide you with a cosmetic solution that makes you happy. However, in many cases, the mole is actually step one to skin cancer, which is why, the moment you see a suspicious mole, it would be best that you head to a dermatologist, who will be able to decipher the same.

Skin Cancer and Tanning Beds

Skin cancer continues to be the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer in the United States. Skin cancer remains the second most common cancer for women between the ages of 20-29 years old. Many skin cancers are directly linked to both indoor and outdoor tanning behaviors. Although outdoor tanning occurs through a variety of avenues (sports, workplace, etc.) indoor tanning in the United States mainly occurs within tanning salons with special tanning beds.

Tanning beds are specially designed devices that emit UV radiation and light during a predetermined amount of time. Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified tanning beds as carcinogenic to human. This is their most serious classification and helped to reinforce the decisions of many states to ban the use of tanning beds for people under the age of 16 and to require parental consent for anyone under the age of 18.

Interestingly, several high profile cases of skin cancer among beauty pageant participants have led to multiple pushes for more restrictive tanning laws in a variety of different states. Although it may seem that this push against tanning is only in the United States, it has truly became an international fight. Several western European Countries have enacted similar restrictions and Brazil and five of Australia’s states have banned tanning completely.

Of people who do use tanning beds there are several behaviors that are particularly risky. These are:

  • Failing to wear the provided goggles (this can cause severe eye issues or even ocular melanoma)
  • Beginning with long exposures – this can cause burning
  • Failing to follow the manufacturer recommended exposure times that are based on skin type
  • Tanning while using medications that may make you more sensitive to UV rays.
  • Tanning while under the age of 16 – the younger an individual begins tanning the more likely their chances of developing skin cancer.

Although many tanning companies may claim that indoor tanning is the “safest way to get vitamin D” this is simply not true. The majority of Americans are able to receive their recommended amount of Vitamin D through their diets and normal everyday sunlight exposure. The FDA and FTC have recently begun to investigate and prosecute major tanning bed companies in regards to multiple false claims regarding the vitamin D statements.

In conclusion, tanning beds are a dangerous habit. The United States still has thousands of salons that offer tanning, but regulations are becoming stricter and more prevalent. Of particular concern is the wide amount of false and misinformation regarding the safety of indoor tanning. The Surgeon general, along with the CDC and FDA, are steadily working to help raise public awareness about the dangers of indoor tanning.

Antibiotics Make You Susceptible to Skin Cancer

Do you know Some antibiotics can lead to a higher sun sensitivity of the skin and thus may lead to increased skin cancer risk?

Antibiotics make you susceptible to skin cancer

Most people believe that the sun is THE risk factor for the development of skin cancer.Hardly anyone is considering that there could perhaps be quite different causes.Antibiotics, for example, make the skin to sunlight only really sensitive and thus increase the risk of skin cancer considerably.

The skin protects itself

The human skin is not defenseless against the sun. Different body’s protective mechanisms to preserve them from sunburn, from the negative effects of UV radiation and thus against malignant skin cancers. The protein p53, for example, among all the body’s own sun protection mechanisms a real key role.

The cancer-protective police body

p53 not only protects the skin from the sun and consequently against skin cancer. p53 belongs to a type of cancer-protective police, who are in the whole body care that there are no cancerous changes. Thus one can degenerate into cells – no matter where they are located in the body – extremely high p53 levels observed, whereas in normal cells as well as no p53 proteins are present. What does p53 in transformed cells? It ensures that the damaged DNA regions * be repaired. If it turns out that the damage is irreparable, p53 causes the death of the diseased cell to prevent in this way that it evolved from a tumor.Thus p53 is a tumor-type brakes.

* = Genetic information of DNA in the nucleus

Cancer occurs only when the body’s own cancer protection is blocked

If, however, p53 is blocked in some way, then multiply the cells degenerate and it leads to tumor formation. Furthermore, defects in the p53 protein leading to enhanced photocarcinogenesis – this is the development of skin cancer due to sun exposure.

Antibiotics block the body’s own sun protection

However, p53 is not immortal. It is sensitive to cigarette smoke, X-rays, mold toxins, and drugs such as antibiotics or on some very general on chemotherapy. Under the influence of these confounding factors leads to defects in the p53 molecule that now protect its ability, the skin against the sun and the body from cancer, lose.

Several antibiotics are prescribed for many different complaints, not only in p53 inhibit its activity, but also other endogenous protective mechanisms against UV radiation. These include antibiotics such as those of the fluoroquinolone class, such as levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. The applications for these products are pneumonia, urinary tract infections, bacterial infections and many other intestinal infections.

Fluoroquinolones should really only be prescribed when it comes to combat pathogens that have compared the standard antibiotics already developed resistance. This planned economical use of fluoroquinolones had at least two reasons: should the one hand, the fact remains certain that in an emergency nor an effective means is available, and it wanted to the patient – avoid the serious side effects of this class of antibiotics – as long as possible.

Manufacturers advertise risky antibiotics

However, since the fluoroquinolone manufacturers make every effort to establish fluoroquinolones by heavy advertising in the therapist as antibiotics of choice in the outpatient practice, they are far more common than originally intended use. The result: further development of resistance in dangerous pathogens, and patients who are threatened by taking severe side effects.

Withdrawals of six antibiotics

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are known to damage the heart and the liver to promote tendon tears, trigger allergies and cause psychosis, which can bring the patient suicidal desires. Particularly because of their toxicity for the heart and liver were in Germany for six (in the U.S. nine) fluoroquinolone antibiotics – usually later, shortly after being admitted and few deaths and liver transplants – taken off the market.

It pays to read the information leaflet

In the United States was the reason for four withdrawals, the phototoxicity of antibiotics, which turned out until AFTER the drug was approved and the patient had suffered severe skin damage. This does not mean that the remaining fluoroquinolones were not phototoxic.It simply means that the currently approved drugs carry a warning in their package inserts.It says that one should avoid the sun during the therapy. Who does not read the paper and on a sunny day for a walk happy, but unfortunate.

And standard antibiotics increase the photosensitivity of the skin

Therefore would be the best solution – as you might think – still the standard antibiotics such as doxycycline or amoxicillin use, on the (at least not life-threatening) side effects such as diarrhea, destruction of intestinal flora, fungal infections, to “enjoy” etc., and fluoroquinolones really only be used in an emergency. Unfortunately, however, is just doxycycline – one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics – also to those drugs that block the body’s protective mechanisms against UV radiation and hence promote skin cancer.

Antibiotics as maintenance therapy for acne?

Doxycycline is often used in long-term treatment of Lyme disease or acne. This means that the patient in question take away this antibiotic over MONTHS. Patients with acne, it is furthermore mostly young people. Apart from the fact that they have to do better in general than to study the package insert of a medication that raises the question whether they should now actually reside for months or even years in the house? Or may be masked only venture into the open? After all, for example, advises the technicians health insurance on their website, they should (avoid apart from the usual activities such as reading the leaflet, Sun 11 to 15 clock, etc.) to prevent phototoxic reactions caused by drugs, but please nice films UV-opaque to the windows of the house and car mount, to indemnify to survive a long-term therapy.

Sun phobia brings vitamin D deficiency

What is the consequence of such forced medication sunlight phobia? Although the patient remained – if they are to keep the advice – from acute skin damage caused by direct sunlight spared, but suffered (for long-term therapy), sooner or later in a chronic and serious vitamin D deficiency.

Vitamin D is normally produced by sunlight affect the human body itself, while the diet to the vitamin D status contributes only a negligible part. A vitamin D deficiency is therefore inevitable when people (have) become couch potatoes. A low vitamin D levels, however, is in turn associated with a variety of diseases. These include osteoporosis, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases and cancer.

WHO recommends antibiotics for the prevention

Antibiotic therapy provides the patient that is in an almost hopeless conflict. On the one hand, he must avoid the sun, on the other hand, can cause very serious illnesses, the lack of sunlight. Under this aspect, it is impossible to understand how it came to the WHO recommendation to use doxycycline for malaria prophylaxis. In other words, the WHO recommends that people wishing to travel to certain regions of the tropics, taking doxycycline preventively against malaria. For this purpose, one should take one tablet daily, starting one week before they leave, then the whole vacation away and another four weeks if you’re back at home. Unfortunately, the WHO did not bother to explain how it should be possible during a vacation in the sunny tropics quite well known, but to avoid the sun because of the long-term use of doxycycline.

What really causes skin cancer?

With today’s widespread long-term use phototoxic or photocarcinogenic effective medications for chronic, not acutely life-threatening disease is the vehement question, whether the years steadily growing number of skin cancer cases are not much more with these drugs together is as that of all sides pesky sun.

Breaking new ground

Especially with chronic diseases should take into account that there are quite well off the conventional medical therapies paths. These are therapies that – activate the self-protection and self-healing mechanisms of the body and not weaken it as – in contrast to the above-mentioned drugs. Antibiotics are unavoidable, while one should be particularly nutrient-rich diet and basenüberschüssige be practiced in order to assist the body in this way at least positive. Following the antibiotic therapy can also be taken actions that serve to detoxify, leading to the restoration of intestinal flora and build and strengthen the people in general again.